You know you have to let them go.
🎧 Listen to this episode:
The performance reviews tell the same story every year. The metrics aren't there. The misalignment with your team is obvious.
But here's the problem: everybody loves them.
They show up to everything. They make people laugh. They remember birthdays and bring donuts on Fridays. And you're about to become the bad guy.
Why? Because likability and effectiveness are not the same thing. But try telling that to team members who are upset about your decision.
If you're facing this situation right now, you're not alone. And more importantly, you're not wrong for recognizing that something has to change.
Here's what makes this kind of staffing decision so brutal: This isn't a character issue or a moral failure. It's not toxic behavior or divisiveness.
Those terminations are painful, but they're clear. Everyone understands why they had to happen.
This one? This one's murky.
The person is genuinely kind. Genuinely loved. They have a heart for ministry and people gravitate toward them. But they're simply not doing the job you hired them to do. And the gap between what they deliver and what the church needs keeps growing.
As a church leader, you're stuck in an impossible position. You can see what others can't—or won't—see. And you know that continuing down this path isn't fair to anyone, including the person who needs to transition out.
"Whatever you do, work at it with all your heart, as working for the Lord, not for human masters, since you know that you will receive an inheritance from the Lord as a reward. It is the Lord Christ you are serving." — Colossians 3:23-24
I've seen this play out dozens of times, and the pattern is always the same. When you delay making the hard call, something subtle but damaging begins to happen:
You start compensating.
You give their responsibilities to other people. You quietly redesign their role to fit what they can do instead of what they should be doing. You work around them rather than with them.
And your other staff members notice.
They're picking up the slack. They're covering the gaps. And they're wondering why leadership won't address what's becoming increasingly obvious to everyone.
The longer you wait, the more people assume that popularity equals performance. You're unintentionally teaching your team that being liked matters more than being effective.
Meanwhile, this beloved staff member probably doesn't even realize the gap exists. They think everything's fine because people smile at them and appreciate their presence. They're blind to their own ineffectiveness.
But here's the truth you need to hear: Your job isn't to protect their feelings. It's to steward the mission of the church.
So how do you make the move you know you need to make without creating unnecessary damage? Here are three essential steps:
Not "they're nice, but..." — you need actual, measurable gaps in performance, alignment, or capacity.
Can you point to specific expectations that aren't being met? Can you document patterns of missed goals or misalignment with team direction? Can you articulate the gap between what the role requires and what they're delivering?
If you can't name it clearly, you're not ready to act. Spend the time to get this right. Write it down. Be specific. Be fair. But be honest.
Before you involve elders, HR, or anyone else, sit down with this person directly.
Give them a real chance to close the gap or transition with dignity. Some people will rise to this moment when they finally understand what's at stake. Most won't. But you owe them that clarity.
This conversation should be direct but kind. It should be specific but not cruel. And it should give them the opportunity to respond and, if possible, to course-correct.
"Brothers and sisters, if someone is caught in a sin, you who live by the Spirit should restore that person gently. But watch yourselves, or you also may be tempted. Carry each other's burdens, and in this way you will fulfill the law of Christ." — Galatians 6:1-2
Because it's coming.
People will be confused. Some will be hurt. A few will be angry. And you need to be ready for that.
Here's the part that makes this so difficult: You cannot defend your decision publicly.
You can't say "they weren't hitting their goals" or "they were misaligned with our vision." You can't share the performance reviews or the documentation you've carefully compiled.
So people will fill in the blanks—and they won't fill them in your favor.
They'll assume you're being harsh. Or political. Or that you just didn't like them. That's the cost of doing this right. That's the cost of protecting someone's dignity even as you help them transition out.
Firing someone who's ineffective but likable is one of the loneliest decisions you'll make as a church leader.
Why? Because it forces you to choose mission over comfort. It forces you to lead when it would be so much easier to avoid conflict and keep the peace.
And it reveals whether you're willing to protect the 95% of your church who need you to make hard calls, even when the 5% who are closest to this person will be upset.
Patrick Lencioni talks about how leaders have to be comfortable being misunderstood. This is one of those moments.
You protect their dignity. You own the decision. You let it cost you some relational capital. And you trust that over time, the right people will see it was the right call.
Jesus didn't keep Judas on the team because the other disciples liked him. He made decisions based on the mission. And while that's an extreme example, the principle holds: Popularity doesn't equal effectiveness.
Protecting one person's feelings at the expense of your mission isn't kindness. It's actually a form of cowardice. It's choosing your own comfort over the health of the entire organization.
"His master replied, 'Well done, good and faithful servant! You have been faithful with a few things; I will put you in charge of many things.'" — Matthew 25:21
If you're in the middle of one of these situations right now, let me encourage you: The decision that feels hardest in this moment is often the one that brings the most health in the long run.
Your other staff members are watching to see if you'll address what they already know needs to be addressed. Your church is depending on you to steward the mission well. And honestly, even the person who needs to transition out deserves the clarity and dignity of truth.
Sometimes leading well means making decisions that will cost you relational capital. But you do it anyway, because that's what good leaders—what good shepherds—do.
Maybe you're stuck in the middle of one of these decisions right now and you need somebody who doesn't have a dog in the fight to talk it through with you.
I'd love to be that person for you and your church. Reach out to me at podcast@chemistrystaffing.com. I'd love to hear your story and see if there's any way we can help.
Because here's what I know: You're not alone in this. These decisions are never easy. But they're part of faithful leadership.
And on the other side of the hard conversation, there's often more clarity, more health, and more mission alignment than you thought possible.
This post is based on Episode 672 of the Healthy Church Staff Podcast. For more resources on building and leading healthy church teams, visit ChemistryStaffing.com.